Metabolic Syndrome: The Deadly Quartet

Legos_KF

In a moment, I’m going to throw out a few rather depressing statistics about metabolic syndrome (MetS) and the state of health in the U.S. These stats need articulating. Over and over and over, until we get it.

We also need to be very clear on the driving forces behind our rapid descent into a disease culture. I’ll mention a couple in this blog. If we understand the root problems, chances are much higher we’ll be motivated and empowered to embrace solutions. (Perhaps only because we’re angered by the extent to which — yet again — health is a distant runner up to profit.)

But there are do-able solutions, which I’ll also mention shortly. And what’s particularly wonderful about the solutions is that they help not just you, your family, your neighbors, your community, but also the planet.

Once called “The Deadly Quartet,” MetS is comprised of elevated blood sugar, blood fat (triglycerides), blood pressure and weight (abdominal adiposity).  We’re not talking that elevated, though.  Take blood sugar, for instance. For a fasting blood sugar to be in the MetS range, it need only hit 100 mg/dL. But 100 mg/dL is actually considered a normal result by many laboratories! (Laboratory reference ranges are based on the population as a whole. So if everyone goes up, the reference range for normal will generally go up, too. An interested future blog: Understanding Reference Ranges.  I tussled with the reference range conundrum in the B12 blog, also.) The point is this: You won’t always see fasting blood sugar flagged “high” on your lab report to draw attention to the number. And unfortunately, a level of 100 mg/dL doesn’t alert many doctors either.

Do you know your fasting blood sugar number? To be sure, it’s not the whole story, but it’s arguably more important than the vaunted “total cholesterol” number that gets far more P.R. High blood sugar is the third leading cause of death in the world!1

Dig into the research a little bit further — scientists in Texas looked at blood sugar and heart disease and found that levels above 86 mg/dL were associated with increased risk for heart disease. That’s quite a bit below 100.2

Note to self: A really good fasting blood sugar is around 86 mg/dL (or lower). Not a whole lot of folks actually clock in at 86.

We’re a culture whose “normal” promotes disease.

How about weight? 70% of us are overweight. Along with elevated blood sugar, it’s part of the deadly quartet. And obesity is the number one risk factor for Type II diabetes.3,4  Obesity is the first leading cause of death in the world, and hypertension is the fifth leading cause of death in the world. Along with elevated blood sugar, that means three of the deadly quartet are leading causes of death.

With these stats, we can’t possibly be surprised that the incidence of type II diabetes increased in the U.S by a whopping 83% between 1995 and 2010, can we? (At 226%, Oklahoma is the state with the dubious honor of highest increase in diabetes.)3,4

I’ll say it again: We’re a culture whose “normal” promotes disease.

While MetS is under-addressed by doctors, it’s well understood to be the “gateway disease,” leading to increased risk of type II diabetes, heart disease, kidney disease, cancers, dementia, autoimmune disease.  Pretty much every chronic disease to confront us is promoted by the inflammation-driven effects of MetS. A look at top causes of death in the U.S. — most of them can be traced to the Deadly Quartet. Here’s the Center for Disease Control’s 2010 list.

Number of deaths for leading causes of death
1              *Heart disease: 597,689
2              *Cancer: 574,743
3              *Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 138,080
4              *Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 129,476
5              Accidents (unintentional injuries): 120,859
6              *Alzheimer’s disease: 83,494
7              *Diabetes: 69,071
8              *Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 50,476
9              *Influenza and Pneumonia: 50,097
10            Intentional self-harm (suicide): 38,364
* Diseases directly or indirectly influenced by MetS. Even suicide, which is often associated with depression, could be driven by MetS via inflammation.5

A couple of driving forces behind our descent into a disease-centered culture.

Junk food.  Michael Moss’s brilliant article from Sunday’s New York Times Magazine, called: “The Extraordinary Science of Addictive Junk Food” says it better and with greater depth than anything I could say.

“The public and the food companies have known for decades now — or at the very least since this meeting — that sugary, salty, fatty foods are not good for us in the quantities that we consume them. So why are the diabetes and obesity and hypertension numbers still spiraling out of control? It’s not just a matter of poor willpower on the part of the consumer and a give-the-people-what-they-want attitude on the part of the food manufacturers. What I found, over four years of research and reporting, was a conscious effort — taking place in labs and marketing meetings and grocery-store aisles — to get people hooked on foods that are convenient and inexpensive.”

Pesticides.  Other potent and often overlooked drivers of MetS and obesity are the pesticides on our foods.

A little-acknowledged study by Lee that was released in 2006 (using National Institute of Health data) noted that exposure to six pesticides (called POPs — persistent organic pollutants) resulted in up to a 38-fold risk for developing type II diabetes in certain individuals!6 (Where’s the publicity on this study?)  By comparison, a study looking at women smokers with a 40-year history found “a mere” 27-fold increased risk for developing lung cancer.7

Obese people were particularly vulnerable to the effects of POPs. POPs are known to accumulate in adipose and cause massive, metabolic disruption.
It’s not just about eating JUNK. It’s the TOXIC JUNK that’s particularly horrific.

The do-able solutions? Here’s a few. Pick a couple:

●     Plant a garden and don’t use pesticides. (Even a little garden pot on the porch with a few basils and tomatoes- you’ll love it!)
●     Buy local food. Where is your farmers market?
●     Exercise. (My goal: Commuting by bike to work 3 days a week).
●     Stop most sugar, and especially the processed stuff
●     Buy food from the perimeter of the grocery store- fresh veggies and fruits; lean, clean proteins
●     Don’t buy food with chemical names in the ingredient list
●     Eat more greens, beans, lean poultry.
●     Read Mark Hyman’s “Blood Sugar Solution.”

When I was in medical school, a professor told us that sugar was a drug, and should be regulated as such. Her statement was an awakening for me. It was a radical idea at the time, but the time has come, hasn’t it?

References
1.           Gray LJ, Khunti K, Williams S, et al. Let's prevent diabetes: study protocol
for a cluster randomised controlled trial of an educational intervention in a
multi-ethnic UK population with screen detected impaired glucose regulation. Cardiovasc
Diabetol. 2012;11:56.

2.           Hoogwerf BJ, Sprecher DL, Pearce GL, et al. Blood glucose concentrations <
or = 125 mg/dl and coronary heart disease risk. Am J Cardiol. Mar 1
2002;89(5):596-599.

3.           Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Atlanta GUSDoHaHS, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011. National diabetes fact sheet:
national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the
United States, 2011. 2011.

4.           MMWR. Increasing Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes - United States and Puerto
Rico, 1995-2010. November 16, 2012 / 61(45);918-921.

5.           Silic A, Karlovic D, Serretti A. Increased inflammation and lower platelet 5-HT
in depression with metabolic syndrome. J Affect Disord. Dec 1
2012;141(1):72-78.

6.           Lee DH, Lee IK, Song K, et al. A strong dose-response relation between serum
concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and diabetes: results from the
National Health and Examination Survey 1999-2002. Diabetes Care. Jul
2006;29(7):1638-1644.

7.           Kligerman S, White C. Epidemiology of lung cancer in women: risk factors,
survival, and screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Feb 2011;196(2):287-295.

– See more at: http://www.drkarafitzgerald.com/deadly-quartet#sthash.kKxv3aPH.dpuf

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *